U.S. Afghans Test-Drive Democracy and Hit Bumps

Politics: Emigres at a meeting in Laguna Hills find it's no easy task electing an advisory council but vow to prove factions can coexist. By KIMI YOSHINO Los Angeles Times February 3 2002

Anyone wondering why it's been so difficult launching a new government in Afghanistan need look no further than the Pacific Hills Banquet Hall in southern Orange County.

The 1,000 Afghan refugees from Southern California who showed up for a meeting last week shared a desire to take part in the rebuilding of their homeland. But that was all they shared.

Within minutes, the meeting was over, with no vote cast for representatives to an advisory council. There were reports of shouting, a little bit of shoving, accusations that one speaker was a Taliban supporter (he denied it), even hair pulling among a few women. In the end, nobody was arrested and nobody was hurt, but sheriff's deputies had to help disperse the crowd. Filled with noble intentions to elect local representatives, Afghans in the United States are instead receiving a history lesson in the often messy business called democracy. The process has made them confront the tribal and political divisions that survive even here, thousands of miles from the strife in their ancestral country.

"The country has been in war for 23 years and it's been difficult," said Hasan Nouri of Laguna Hills, an organizer of last week's failed election in Southern California.

"Some of it filters here. There are sympathizers of the Taliban. Sympathizers of the Communist Party. We have Northern Alliance. We have Pashtun. That unfortunate characteristic of Afghanistan is also evident here ....The word 'retreat' is nonexistent in the Afghan vocabulary. And retreat is necessary in democracy."

Similar scenes have occurred in other Afghan immigrant communities.

In New York City, tempers flared and voices were raised at an election. A vote in Fremont, Calif., dragged on for eight hours and was criticized afterward by people who felt not everyone was fairly represented. Organizers in Washington, D.C., are wondering what will happen today, when more than 1,000 people are expected at an election.

''What we're trying to do is take the initial steps of democracy," said Hamed Etebar of Virginia, one of the organizers. "This process is painful and the road is long. But we are very hopeful that all Afghans, after seeing their country desolate and destroyed for 23 years, will come together and become one Afghanistan.''

When the votes are complete in four areas across the United States, Afghans hope to have a 40-member national council, one that will act as the community's unified voice in the U.S. to lobby for aid and offer advice about setting up a new Afghan government.

Southern California Afghans said they plan to try again, learning from last Sunday's mistakes, when the meeting fell into disarray even before it was officially convened with a reading from the Koran. Hundreds squeezed into a room too small to accommodate the crowd. Hundreds more congregated outside, unable to hear. Speakers grabbed for the microphone. Private security guards removed at least two men from the Laguna Hills banquet hall, setting off a fresh round of complaints. Some, like Afghanistan Mirror expatriate magazine publisher Sayed Hashemeyan of Montclair, complained of "profiling"--alleging that dissenters were purposely kept out.

Many do not understand the reason for the election. Some thought they were selecting delegates to meet President Bush and interim Afghan leader Hamid Karzai. Others thought if they were elected to this council, they could be considered for a spot in the Afghanistan loya jirga process. Aloya jirga, or grand council, is to be convened in Afghanistan to draft a constitution and rules for electing a permanent government.

Hashemeyan brought a list of questions, numbered and written in Farsi, to the Southern California election. Item number seven, he said, read, "What is the necessity of this election? Why are we doing it? What is the purpose? What is the rush?"

There is no rush, organizers said, except that for the first time in 23 years, they see hope for their old country. Democracy is something they want for Afghanistan. It is something they want to practice here to show the world that it is possible to bring a divided community to unity, even if the process is painful and painstaking.

Even as the Taliban crumbles and the popular exiled Afghanistan king takes a back seat to Karzai, old alliances die hard.

As Zohra Daoud of Malibu put it, "Some people are holding onto their grudges."

Some said the process of coming together is difficult not so much because of grudges but because there is a lack of information. Hasan Aliyar, president of the Aryana Cultural Center in San Diego, boycotted the meeting in Orange County and fired off a critical letter to an Afghan newspaper and to government officials, saying that he has no idea who organized the election or why.

Another San Diego resident, Sakhi Ashrafzai, criticized the group for being self-appointed and said residents in Northern California, New York and Virginia are also complaining about "such clandestine events."

But Nouri and Noor Delawari of La Canada Flintridge said the meetings have been well-advertised. They accused critics of being pro-Taliban and bent on derailing the process.

Hashemeyan, once a Taliban sympathizer, said he has revoked his Taliban support and just wants to ensure an open election.

Afghan immigrants in New York and Northern California--the two regions that have successfully elected their 10 representatives--also complained that not enough people knew about the voting.

Organizers said they did their best to publicize elections. They advertised on Afghan radio and in some Afghan publications, sent mass e-mailings and distributed fliers at Afghan restaurants and markets.

Yet, with religious differences, family rivalries, ethnic divisions between the Pashtun and Tajik tribes, and conflicts between the old and young, it's no wonder there has been dissension.

Maliha Zulfacar, a sociologist at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, said the Southern California Afghans are particularly "clannish," with members of three prominent and large families taking part in the election.

There is an established generation that has been active in the U.S. for 20 or 30 years, she said, as well as newcomer immigrants.

"Some people will say that this has no legality," said Dr. Bashir Zikria, a New Jersey surgeon who organized the election in New York. "But it is our right to elect our representatives for any reason we want to, even if there is no precedent about it. Nobody has to give us the right. We are free citizens."

Sayed Massood Majrooh, 51, of Fremont was elected last month in Northern California. Despite the criticism, he said, "We are striving for unification." The complaints, he added, are not among "the orderly people."

Like many other Afghans who have watched the destruction of their country, Nouri, the organizer of the event in Laguna Hills, has an image burned on his mind. It was 1984 after the Soviet Union bombed a village in Afghanistan, where Nouri was operating a medical clinic. A doctor brought back a firsthand account. He found only three survivors--an old man, a 3-year-old child and a baby. The 3-year-old was feeding the baby through the breasts of his dead mother, Nouri said.

"For the rest of my life, I'm not going to stop until justice is done and peace is brought," Nouri said. "I cannot let it go."

Iran threatens to expel hardline Afghan dissident

TEHRAN, Feb 6 (Reuters) - Iran threatened on Wednesday to expel Afghan guerrilla leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar after he called for armed struggle to eject foreign troops from Afghanistan.

"We will not accept this. We will pursue the issue with the legal government in Afghanistan. Iran is no place for any one or group that resorts to mischief," Interior Minister Abdolvahed Mousavi-Lari told Iran's IRNA news agency.

"We will pursue the issue of Hekmatyar through our intelligence ministry and other channels and make a due decision about him," he said.

Hekmatyar told Reuters on Tuesday he opposed the interim government of Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan, saying it was installed by foreign troops "occupying my country."

"I have a lot of organised forces. They have weapons and we are in contact with them," he said. "I have been fighting for my country for 34 years and I want a free and independent Afghanistan. Until then, I will continue my fight."

International peacekeeping troops are deployed in the capital Kabul after U.S. forces joined opposition Northern Alliance fighters to rout the ruling Taliban and destroy Saudi-born militant Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network.

The United States has accused Iran of trying to destabilise the fragile new government in neighbouring Afghanistan and providing refuge to fleeing al Qaeda members.

Tehran has vehemently denied both charges.

Some reformist Iranian parliamentarians have called for Hekmatyar to leave Iran as his presence runs counter to Iran's official policy of backing the U.N.-backed government in Kabul.

Hekmatyar, a former prime minister and a central figure in the Afghan civil war in the 1990s, said in the interview he had made an unsuccessful bid to forge a coalition against U.S. attacks on Afghanistan which began last October.

"I tried to form a front to fight against the presence of foreigners in Afghanistan. I negotiated with all the groups and invited all of them for talks, but I was unsuccessful."