Hopes soar with assurance
of Taliban's cooperation
The Times of India
By Dileep Padgaonkar
NEW DELHI: Hopes of an early and peaceful end to the hijacking crisis soared
on Monday after influential elements of the Taliban left New Delhi in no doubt
that Afghanistan's hardline Islamic regime would extend its fullest cooperation
to India to ensure the safe return of the passengers and the crew of the
ill-fated Indian Airlines plane grounded in Kandahar.
Without such a reassurance from the regime - which India, like most nations
in the world, does not recognise - the Indian authorities would have been
completely hamstrung to even establish a dialogue with the hijackers, let alone
devise ways and means to meet the government's twin objectives: secure the
release of the passengers and the crew and, above all, to uphold the overall
national interest.
Highly placed sources in the government explained that once the plane landed
in Kandahar, which was the destination of the hijackers from the very start,
New Delhi had to find out how much support they effectively enjoyed from the
Taliban. The government had every reason to believe that Pakistan's ISI and
some elements of the Taliban were in cahoots with the hijackers. But it was
also aware that the Taliban is not as cohesive a force as it is made out to be.
The first indications that this support was not fulsome came, according to
the sources, when late on Friday evening influential figures of the regime
convened a shura, a decision-making assembly of elders, to discuss the
hijacking. When various Taliban officials subsequently let it be known that
they regarded the hijackers to be ``unreliable criminals'' and vowed to storm
the plane after the hijackers threatened to kill the hostages if their demands
were not met, New Delhi was convinced that the two did not see eye-to-eye.
This was the moment the government was waiting for before it could swing
into action. Any move on its part to talk to the hijackers or send emissaries,
doctors and a new crew to Kandahar earlier would have been fraught with
terrible risks. For obvious reasons, it could not have divulged its strategy.
To do so would have meant playing straight into the hands of Pakistan and those
Taliban elements sworn to unbridled hostility towards India.
The story of India's decision to make a clean break with its stated position
regarding the Taliban regime must await the disclosure of more details. It is
an opportunity for the Taliban, considered a pariah by the international
community, to come out of its isolation by helping New Delhi resolve the hijack
crisis.
The sources said that even as New Delhi was awaiting signals from the
Taliban of its willingness to cooperate with Indian authorities, the latter
were engaged in intensive diplomatic activity around the world. The fact that
governments were observing a holiday - the hijacking took place on Boxer's Day,
then the Christmas weekend intervened and Ramzan is still on - was a major
impediment to get governments to react to the outrage.
Even so, external affairs minister Jaswant Singh was able to personally
speak to the foreign ministers of 15 countries, including those of the major
powers, to urge them to make Pakistan see reason. Alongside, Indian envoys in
various world capitals briefed governments on the hijacking developments as did
India's permanent representative at the UN in New York.
The government, the sources said, was clear from the very beginning that it
would not allow the UN to play any kind of an intermediary role but it was not
averse to let the world body, and indeed representatives of other foreign
missions, be present in Kandahar to witness India's determination to combat yet
another instance of international terrorism sponsored from across the border.
The sources said that the controversy over the demands made by the hijackers
was not warranted. This was partly because their identity could not be firmly
established, partly because the so-called demands were never made formally but
communicated through the pilot and the Taliban authorities (and hence could
have been mere ploys) and partly because the demands themselves became more and
more bizarre. On one occasion, for instance, the hijackers reportedly said that
they would release 15 hostages for every PoW in Indian custody.
The sources also revealed that another controversy - regarding the
government's failure to ground the plane in Amritsar - will be set to rest once
an inquiry of what transpired on a minute-to-minute basis is completed. It was
pointed out that the first instructions sent from New Delhi was to stop the
aircraft. However, the hijacker asked the pilot, with a knife pointing to his
neck, to shift the aircraft every five to seven minutes. The full story of how
it did manage to leave for Lahore must await the results of the inquiry.
(However, according to a late-night UNI report, the government denied that
an inquiry had been ordered into what happened at Amritsar's Raja Sansi airport
when the hijacked plane had stopped there.)